Basic presuppositions is the scientific approach utilized in philosophical inquiry and reasoning

![BlogPostImage](https://ramblingatthebridgehead.files.wordpress.com/2015/07/homunculus_drawing_620x350.jpg)
[Image Source](https://ramblingatthebridgehead.files.wordpress.com/2015/07/homunculus_drawing_620x350.jpg)
The genuine philosophic strategy ought not be disproportionate, ought not be one-sided to a specific or unique creed, yet comprehend inside itself the procedures of reflection and theory and in the meantime have the capacity to accommodate the deductive and the inductive strategies for reasoning. The philosophy of the absolute transcends particulars to greater and greater universals, constructing itself in light of realities of perception and experience by the strategy for enlistment and progressive generalization of truths, without missing even a solitary connection in the chain of logic and argumentation, reflection and consideration, until the point when it achieves the most noteworthy generalization of the absolute truth, and after that by the deductive technique comes down to translate and clarify the certainties of experience in the light of the nature of this truth. Philosophy being the method for the knowledge of truth, its strategy must be in concurrence with the nature of truth. In philosophy and religion the end dependably decides the nature of the means. What we know isn't completely unique in nature from the basic constitution of the means by which we know it. ![BlogPostImage](https://www.hpbbnieuws.nl/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/call-center-employee-experience-hr-wfm-1080x675.png)
[Image Source](https://www.hpbbnieuws.nl/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/call-center-employee-experience-hr-wfm-1080x675.png)
The prompt objects of our experience here are the elements of the physical universe, and the means of our knowledge of them are our senses which share of physical attributes. Subsequently the strategy that philosophy utilizes in its way to deal with truth is much dependent upon what origination we have of philosophy and of the nature of the objective of philosophy. The objective might be matter, mind or Spirit, and as needs be moved toward becoming either materialists, idealists. The instrument of knowledge might be the senses, comprehension, reason or instinct. Furthermore, the speculations of knowledge may prompt progress toward becoming empiricists, transcendentalists, rationalists, spiritual intuitionists. Every one of these speculations resort for the most part to two procedures, consideration of what is thought to be indubitable and genuine, and a looking examination and basic investigation of observational experience, including every one of the techniques and finishes of science. The previous encourages us to a greater knowledge of the objective of philosophy, and the last to a denial of false esteems and vindication of the techniques and major standards of philosophy. The hypotheses of knowledge and reality for the most part subject the current ones to a basic examination as to their nature and substance and discovered solid systems of thought after extended consideration on the conceivable nature of reality. ![BlogPostImage](http://extras.mnginteractive.com/live/media/site25/2016/0111/20160111__11CDWBSTAR_webw~1.jpg)
[Image Source](http://extras.mnginteractive.com/live/media/site25/2016/0111/20160111__11CDWBSTAR_webw~1.jpg)
Philosophy is said to have started with wonder. The wonder of creation brings out the profound respect of man, and its obscurity energizes his wonder, and this wonder normally prompts a genuine enquiry into the nature of things, for man isn't substance to rest in a condition of amazement in light of obliviousness and is interested to know the truth behind the enchanting wonder of the world. He examines, hypothesizes, contends and talks about, and goes to a settled supposition of the nature of things in this wonderful world. This turns into his philosophy. Modern man, in any case, appears to have ventured into the area of philosophy through uncertainty and suspicious reasoning. Man started questioning the legitimacy of authority and authoritative opinion no not as much as that of acknowledged conventional convictions. Descartes began with questioning everything, even the legitimacy of thought itself. ![BlogPostImage](http://www.liftupideas.com/quotes/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/true-knowledge-quotation-quote-to-know-what-you-know-what-confucius.jpg)
[Image Source](http://www.liftupideas.com/quotes/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/true-knowledge-quotation-quote-to-know-what-you-know-what-confucius.jpg)
http://thinkingspace.org.uk/about-philosophical-enquiry https://www.thinkingscripts.co.uk/pdf/villagep4c.pdf https://www.philosophy-foundation.org/blog/peter-worley-a-philosophical-enquiry-strategy-for-up-against-it-secondary-school-teachers